Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275717›Full record

ArticlePolicy, politics & nursing practice2025

Advocating for Professional Advocates in Nursing and Midwifery.

Hilary Engward, Sally Goldspink, Nieky van Veggel, Naim Abdulmohdi, Andrea Tuckwell, Marie Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hilary EngwardAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Veterans and Families Institute for Military Social Research, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-7131
Sally GoldspinkAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-2766
Nieky van VeggelAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6738-6989
Naim AbdulmohdiAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-965X
Andrea TuckwellAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Marie AlexanderEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Offices, Colchester Hospital, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-5909-2065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses the development of professional advocacy in the U.K. nursing and midwifery professions. Initially established in midwifery, the discourse of professional advocacy has gradually shifted from a patient focus to advocating for the professionals in their professional roles. This move is driven by the need to influence the health, well-being, and efficacy of the health professions, thereby positively impacting patient care. The concept of advocacy is thus expanding from advocacy focussing on patients/social groups, to incorporating advocating for health professionals by health professionals. However, it is unclear if literature and evidence is keeping pace with this potential conceptual shift taking place in the practice setting, and it is unclear if past patient-centered conceptualizations of advocacy are relevant to the context of professional-oriented advocacy. This article aims to initiate this discussion specific to the nursing profession.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNurse's RolePatient AdvocacyFemaleHumansUnited Kingdommidwiferynursingprofessional advocacyprofessional practice

Identifiers

PMID40275717
PMCPMC12214286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.