ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2025
Analysis of fertility-preserving treatment outcomes in patients with POLE-mutated endometrioid carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Current Treatment Options Guided by Molecular Classification in Endometrial Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the clinical outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment (FST) in patients with POLE-mutated endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). A total of 9 EEC patients who received FST and were classified to the POLE-mutated subtype in Peking University People's Hospital from April 2020 to October 2023, were retrospectively collected. Clinical and pathological data were analyzed to describe the outcomes of FST in patients with POLE-mutated EEC. A total of 9 patients with EEC including 6 cases with well-differentiated (G1) and 3 cases with moderately-differentiated (G2). The average age was 34.8±2.1 years. POLE mutation sites were P286R (5 cases), V411L (2 cases), L424I (1 cases), and S459F (1 cases), respectively. The median follow-up time was 16 months (9-41 months). The complete response (CR) rate was 88.9% (8/9), with a median time to CR of 5.5 months (3-18 months). The partial response (PR) rate was 11.1% (1/9). The relapse rate was 50.0% (4/8), with a median recurrence time of 9.5 months (5-25 months). Of these, 75% (3/4) underwent secondary FST, with all achieving CR again (3/3). Three of 5 who were out-of-indication patients achieved CR by individual therapy. FST in patients with POLE-mutated EEC achieve a CR rate of 88.9% in this study, the largest number of retrievable reports. In certain patients who are out-of-indication, individualized treatment may also result in remission. However, unlike surgical patients, some patients experience disease recurrence and whether POLE-mutated EEC is sensitive to conventional therapy in FST is controversial given its pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.