ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
Everyday Communication Experiences of Persons With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Their Caregivers: Implications for Novel Speech Interventions.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rehabilitation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Recommendations for Clinical Practice and Further Research.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Living with Dysphagia and Dysarthria: A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of People with Motor Neuron Disease and Their Caregivers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Stage-Based Communication Rehabilitation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Quality of Life.Archives of internal medicine research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsSpeech intelligibility decline is a common in dysarthria secondary to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, interventions that focus on improving speech may not be able to counteract decline as the disease progresses. Researchers have suggested interventions that help PALS's communication partners tune their speech perception systems to PALS's production. In the current study, we take a first step to establishing the need and enthusiasm for such interventions on the part of PALS and their caregivers (CPALS).
methodsPALS and CPALS recruited from the Greater Philadelphia chapter of the ALS association completed novel questionnaires probing their everyday speech communication and speech intervention experiences. Questions focused especially on changes in communication partners' ability to understand PALS' speech. Both quantitative and qualitative data were recorded.
resultsPALS (n = 21) and CPALS (n = 22) reported speech as a primary mode of communication despite declines in intelligibility. However, most also indicated variability in PALS's speech intelligibility depending on the communication partner, indicating that frequent communication partners were better able to understand PALS's speech. Both groups reported interest in interventions supporting speech intelligibility and were most interested in speech interventions that included PALS and CPALS together. DISCUSSION: PALS and especially CPALS in our study expressed interest in speech interventions that involved both parties. Thus, there is both a need for and a desire in the community for interactive speech interventions that support intelligibility. Additionally, our findings lend support to clinical approaches targeting frequent communication partners in addition to PALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.