ArticleNursing & health sciences2025
Evaluating Online Interprofessional Education for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Educator and Learner Experiences.
Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Introductory Interprofessional Education for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPE-4-IPCP) online module aimed to provide a consistent approach to IPE and IPCP for health professions staff and students across multiple health organizations. In phase one, validation was completed by an expert panel (CVI: < 0.8) and focus groups, including health professions staff and faculty (n = 9). Focus group findings highlighted the module's application in educational and clinical training contexts. Themes included: content, learner experience, implementation, and benefits for patients/clients. Phase two assessed the impact of the module regarding self-reported confidence and knowledge in IPE, IPCP, and attitudes towards teamwork and willingness to engage in IPCP. Findings indicated premodule and postmodule changes for staff (n = 12) and students (n = 68); however, health professions students reported significant increases in confidence and attitudes towards IPE (p < 0.001) and willingness to engage in IPCP measured by the Interprofessional Socialization Valuing scale (Z = -5.026, p < 0.001). The IPE-4-IPCP module offered health staff and students a shared, mutual understanding of IPE, IPCP, interprofessional thinking, and behaviors in clinical and educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.