Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275605›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Impact of Remote Appointments on the Outcomes of Community Mental Health Nurses in Primary Care Since the Covid Pandemic: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Mark Kenwright, Paula Fairclough, Charlotte Graham

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark KenwrightUniversity of Staffordshire Centre for Health Innovation, Stafford, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4675-6506
Paula FaircloughKeele University, Keele, England.
Charlotte GrahamKeele University, Keele, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The move to remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic has remained an integral method of mental health service delivery. Yet there is a lack of evidence on the longer-term impact of this change, or on the comparative effectiveness of different remote formats. This retrospective observational cohort study examined the effect of the move to remote delivery on the effectiveness and practice of Community Mental Health Nurses in primary care. Data from 1634 referrals was examined across three cohorts: Those treated face-to-face pre-pandemic; those treated remotely during the pandemic restrictions; and those treated in a blended approach (remote and face-to-face) up to 16 months post-pandemic. Means, standard deviations and effect sizes for pre-post treatment change are reported for all clinical measures. Logistic regression examined predictors of reliable change. Despite increased severity in the mental health problems treated, effect sizes for remote treatment post-pandemic (0.5-0.8) were comparable to those for pre-pandemic face-to-face treatment (0.5-0.9). The blended use of online video appointments predicted better engagement and reliable improvement. The sole use of telephone appointments for complex problems predicted lower rates of engagement and improvement.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesCOVID-19Mental DisordersPrimary Health CarePsychiatric NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTelemedicineCommunity Mental Health Nursespost‐pandemicprimary careremote delivery

Identifiers

PMID40275605
PMCPMC12022468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.