Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275451›Full record

ArticlePsyCh journal2025

Authentic Inner Compass and Subjective Well-Being Among Chinese Emerging Adults: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Niting Guo, Tianyuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niting GuoSchool of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0342-6356
Tianyuan LiSchool of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-3580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Originating from the self-determination theory, the authentic inner compass (AIC) enlightens people about their authentic values, interests, and life aspirations, functioning as an action-guiding schema. Previous studies have examined AIC among adolescents, but its significance for emerging adults is underexplored, especially in less autonomy-oriented cultures (e.g., Chinese cultures). Informed by the self-determination theory, the present study aimed to investigate the association between AIC and subjective well-being among Chinese emerging adults and examine further the mediating role of resilience and the moderating role of anxious attachment. A total of 155 Chinese emerging adults completed measures on AIC, resilience, anxious attachment, and subjective well-being. The results showed that AIC was positively associated with subjective well-being, and resilience fully mediated the association. Moreover, anxious attachment strengthened the positive link between AIC and resilience. The findings highlight the importance of AIC and resilience in boosting subjective well-being, emphasizing the significance of AIC for anxiously attached individuals. The moderated mediation model enriches the self-determination theory and resilience literature. Future practices aiming to promote the well-being of Chinese emerging adults may focus on fostering AIC and resilience and consider individual differences in attachment styles.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentPersonal AutonomyPersonal SatisfactionResilience, PsychologicalSelf ConceptAdolescentAdultAnxietyChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalYoung Adultanxious attachmentauthentic inner compassresilienceself‐determination theorysubjective well‐being

Identifiers

PMID40275451
PMCPMC12318593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.