ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Construction and validation of prognostic model for ICU mortality in cardiac arrest patients: an interpretable machine learning modeling approach.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between early body temperature dynamic trajectory and mortality and infection rates for patients with cardiac arrest in ICU: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning model for early prediction of ICU death in chronic heart failure with pulmonary infection.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Construction of a predictive nomogram for ICU mortality in patients with cardiac arrest using the MIMIC-IV database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Associations of serum sTREM-1 and sTREM-2 with mortality and neurological prognosis in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: a machine learning-based approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence and mortality of cardiac arrest (CA) is high. We developed interpretable machine learning models for early prediction of ICU mortality risk in patients diagnosed with CA.
methodsData from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV, version 2.2) was randomized to training set (0.7) and internal validation set (0.3), and data from eICU(version 2.0.1) was used as external validation set. Five models including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost) were developed. The model with the largest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and good performance in other features was defined as the best model, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was used to improve the interpretability of the optimal model.
resultsA total of 1088 patients from MIMIC-IV, and 3542 patients from eICU were included. Seven variables were selected to construct models by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The RF model was the best predictive model with AUC and 95% CI at 0.83 (0.78-0.88) in internal validation set, and 0.71(0.68-0.74) in external validation set. SHAP analysis found that the variables that had a high impact on the risk of ICU death were minimal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), base excess, anion gap, and urine output.
conclusionRF is the optimal model for predicting the risk of ICU death in CA patients. The development of this model is important for early identification and intervention of CA patients who are at risk of dying in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.