ArticleBiomarker research2025
Association of CAR-T approval on outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at the population level in the United States.
Article in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Five-Year Survival and Determinants of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Resource-Limited Settings: The Impact of HIV/AIDS in a Multi-Center Cohort Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the advent of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL, it is unclear how survival has changed at the population level following its approval. Herein, we performed a population-based cohort study using the SEER-17 database. The primary exposure was a period of diagnosis (2014-2017 vs. 2018-2021), and these periods were selected based on the first FDA-approval of CAR-T in 2017. Study outcomes were relative survival (RS), overall survival (OS), lymphoma-specific survival (LSS), and the cumulative incidence of death from lymphoma (CIF). A total of 51,584 patients with DLBCL were included in the study with 24,861 patients diagnosed in time period-1 (2014-2017) and 26,723 patients diagnosed in time period-2 (2018-2021). The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (interquartile range, 57-77) and most patients were White (n = 42,190, 82%) with advanced stage at diagnosis (n = 28,203, 55%). In unadjusted analysis, the 5-year RS (95% CI) increased from 64% from 2014 to 2017 to 66% from 2018 to 2021, while 5-year OS increased from 54 to 55%, and 5-year LSS increased from 64 to 66%. On competing risks analysis, the 5-year probability of death from lymphoma decreased from 34 to 31%. The improvements in survival were observed across age, disease stage, and racial groups, and remained significant when adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, B symptoms and documented receipt of chemotherapy in multivariable survival models (adjusted OS HR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.94-1.00, p = 0.04; adjusted LSS HR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.90-0.96, p < 0.001). We found improved survival for patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 when compared to those diagnosed between 2014 and 2017. These findings will serve as the benchmark for future studies evaluating the impact of CAR-T administered earlier in their disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.