ArticleTropical medicine and health2025
Mortality predictors and diagnostic challenges in adult tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort of 100 patients.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Poor Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Tuberculous Meningitis: Disease Severity, Host Factors, and Drug Therapy.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of childhood tuberculous meningitis and risk factors for severe neurological sequelae disaggregated by age group.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Concentration of contezolid in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in a patient with renal allograft tuberculosis and tuberculous meningoencephalitis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Predictors of Tuberculous Meningitis Mortality Among Persons with HIV in Mozambique.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Hydrocephalus as a consistent predictor of in-hospital mortality in tuberculous meningitis: no age-specific effect modification in a lifespan cohort.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, diagnostic certainty, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in patients diagnosed with tuberculous meningitis (TBM), using the Lancet scoring system for diagnostic certainty.
methodsA retrospective cohort was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with TBM. Patients were classified based on the Lancet scoring system into definite, probable, and possible TBM categories. Clinical features, neuroimaging findings, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and outcomes were analyzed.
resultsThe median age of patients was 36.5 years, with 57.0% male. The most common symptoms were fever (64.7%), headache (63.6%), and altered consciousness (60.0%). Hydrocephalus was present in 40.0% of cases. Diagnosis certainty was classified as possible (63.0%), probable (22.0%), and definite (15.0%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.0%, with 12-month survival rates of 69.7%. There was no significant difference between the level of diagnostic certainty and the survival of patients. Significant predictors of mortality included hydrocephalus (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.65, 95% CI 1.67 to 7.97), hemoglobin levels (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89), age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06), CSF pleocytosis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.84), and altered consciousness at admission (HR: 19.23, 95% CI 2.57 to 143.85).
conclusionTBM remains a critical concern with significant mortality and morbidity. Key predictors of mortality, including altered consciousness, hydrocephalus, and older age, highlight the need for early detection and tailored interventions. In most cases, the diagnosis cannot be definitively confirmed and is instead categorized as probable or possible. Our study demonstrates that survival rates were comparable across definite, probable, and possible TBM categories, supporting the value of empirical treatment when definitive confirmation is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.