Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275335›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025

Optimal amino acid system for early embryo development in sows based on response surface methodology and high-throughput screening cell models.

Xinyu Wang, Jun Huang, Yanlong Li, Zhekun Zhu, Bangxin Xue, Yueyang Meng, Jiale Bao, Ran Ning, Siyu Li, Fang Chen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xinyu Wang *Frontier Technology Research Institute of China Agricultural University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Jun Huang *Frontier Technology Research Institute of China Agricultural University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Yanlong LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhekun ZhuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bangxin XueState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yueyang MengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jiale BaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ran NingState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Siyu LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Fang ChenGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Shihai ZhangGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xiangzhou ZengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shuang CaiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chuanjiang CaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology Northwest, A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China. caichj@nwafu.edu.cn.
Xiangfang ZengFrontier Technology Research Institute of China Agricultural University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518116, China. ziyangzxf@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172747National Natural Science Foundation of China 32425052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly embryo development plays a pivotal role in determining pregnancy outcomes, postnatal development, and lifelong health. Therefore, the strategic selection of functional nutrients to enhance embryo development is of paramount importance. In this study, we established a stable porcine trophectoderm cell line expressing dual fluorescent reporter genes driven by the CDX2 and TEAD4 gene promoter segments using lentiviral transfection.

resultsThree amino acid metabolites-kynurenic acid, taurine, and tryptamine-met the minimum z-score criteria of 2.0 for both luciferase and Renilla luciferase activities and were initially identified as potential metabolites for embryo development, with their beneficial effects validated by qPCR. Given that the identified metabolites are closely related to methionine, arginine, and tryptophan, we selected these three amino acids, using lysine as a standard, and employed response surface methodology combined with our high-throughput screening cell model to efficiently screen and optimize amino acid combination conducive to early embryo development. The optimized candidate amino acid system included lysine (1.87 mmol/L), methionine (0.82 mmol/L), tryptophan (0.23 mmol/L), and arginine (3 mmol/L), with the ratio of 1:0.43:0.12:1.60. In vitro experiments confirmed that this amino acid system enhances the expression of key genes involved in early embryonic development and improves in vitro embryo adhesion. Transcriptomic analysis of blastocysts suggested that candidate amino acid system enhances early embryo development by regulating early embryonic cell cycle and differentiation, as well as improving nutrient absorption. Furthermore, based on response surface methodology, 400 sows were used to verify this amino acid system, substituting arginine with the more cost-effective N-carbamoyl glutamate (NCG), a precursor of arginine. The optimal dietary amino acid requirement was predicted to be 0.71% lysine, 0.32% methionine, 0.22% tryptophan, and 0.10% NCG for sows during early gestation. The optimized amino acid system ratio of the feed, derived from the peripheral release of essential amino acids, was found to be 1:0.45:0.13, which is largely consistent with the results obtained from the cell model optimization. Subsequently, we furtherly verified that this optimal dietary amino acid system significantly increased total litter size, live litter size and litter weight in sows.

conclusionsIn summary, we successfully established a dual-fluorescent high-throughput screening cell model for the efficient identification of potential nutrients that would promote embryo development and implantation. This innovative approach overcomes the limitations of traditional amino acid nutrition studies in sows, providing a more effective model for enhancing reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

Amino acidEmbryonic developmentHigh throughput screeningNutrientResponse Surface Methodology

Identifiers

PMID40275335
PMCPMC12023682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.