ArticleBMC medical education2025
Nurses' knowledge-attitude-practice of the importance of quality control of nursing documents and the influence of intensive training: a study from a tertiary hospital in China.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehospital Emergency Nurse competence and pain management in patients with acute abdominal pain: a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- The Mediation Effect of Nurses' Artificial Intelligence Literacy Between Professional Self-Concept and Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Exploring the Readiness of Critical Care in Implementing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Hail Hospitals, Saudi Arabia: Findings for Acute Kidney Injury Patient Care Improvement.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate nursing staff's current knowledge-attitude-practice(KAP) regarding nursing document quality control and to explore effective methods to enhance their awareness of nursing documents' importance through intensive training.
methodsWe developed the questionnaire based on a systematic literature review and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Then, we sent the questionnaire to the nurses before and after the intensive training.Data processing and statistical analysis were conducted using R 4.4.0 software.
resultsAltogether, 722, 701, and 800 nurses participated in the questionnaire survey before the training and after two training rounds, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the respondents' baseline data (gender, age, professional title, position, educational background, and working years) before and after the training. After two rounds of intensive quality control training, the nursing staff's median scores in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions increased from 45 points before the training to 49, 50, and 50 points, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that the longer the working years, the higher the scores of the nursing staff after the training (3-5 years, P < 0.01, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.2-0.57), (6-10 years, P < 0.01, 95% CI, 0.35-0.73), (> 10 years, P = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.32-0.72).The nursing staff with the titles of Chief Nurse (P < 0.01, 95% CI, 0.2-0.54) and Deputy Chief Nurse (P < 0.01, 95% CI, 0.21-0.74) scored higher after the training.
conclusionThis study shows that, after two rounds of training, nurses' KAP of the quality control of nursing documents significantly improved. The training had a positive impact on their KAP, which is conducive to enhancing the quality of nursing documents and nursing care. Therefore, hospitals should emphasize the quality control of nursing documents and take effective measures to help nurses continuously improve the quality of nursing documents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.