Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275300›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Enhanced propionate and butyrate metabolism in cecal microbiota contributes to cold-stress adaptation in sheep.

Xindong Cheng, Yanping Liang, Kaixi Ji, Mengyu Feng, Xia Du, Dan Jiao, Xiukun Wu, Chongyue Zhong, Haitao Cong, Guo Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xindong ChengKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yanping LiangKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kaixi JiKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Mengyu FengKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Xia DuKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Dan JiaoKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Xiukun WuKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Chongyue ZhongDongying Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Dongying, 257000, China.
Haitao CongShandong Huakun Rural Revitalization Institute Co., Ltd, Jinan, 250014, China.
Guo YangKey Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Lanzhou Ecological Agriculture Experimental Research Station for Agricultural Ecosystem, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China. yangguo@lzb.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring cold stress, gut microbes play crucial roles in orchestrating energy metabolism to enhance environmental adaptation. In sheep, hindgut microbes ferment carbohydrates to generate short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as an energy source. However, the mechanisms by which hindgut microbes and their metabolites interact with the host to facilitate adaptation to cold environments remain ambiguous. Herein, we simulated a winter environment (- 20 °C) and provided a rationed diet to compare the cold adaptation mechanisms between Hulunbuir and Hu sheep.

resultsOur findings show that cold exposure enhances SCFA metabolism in the sheep cecum. In Hu sheep, acetate, butyrate, and total SCFA concentrations increased, whereas in Hulunbuir sheep, propionate and butyrate concentrations increased, with a notable increase in total SCFAs. Notably, butyrate concentration was higher in Hulunbuir sheep than in Hu sheep under cold stress. Following cold exposure, the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β levels increased in both breeds. In addition, Hu sheep showed increased IL-10, whereas Hulunbuir sheep exhibited elevated secretory IgA levels. The cecal microbiota responded differently, Hu sheep showed no notable changes in alpha and beta diversity, whereas Hulunbuir sheep exhibited considerable alterations. In Hu sheep, the abundance of fungi, specifically Blastocystis sp. subtype 4, decreased, and that of several Lachnospiraceae species (Roseburia hominis, Faecalicatena contorta, and Ruminococcus gnavus) involved in SCFA metabolism increased. Pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism, such as starch and sucrose metabolism, galactose metabolism, and pentose and glucuronate interconversions, were upregulated. In Hulunbuir sheep, the abundance of Treponema bryantii, Roseburia sp. 499, and Prevotella copri increased, with upregulation in pathways related to amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism. Cold exposure increased node connectivity within the symbiotic networks of both breeds, with increased network vulnerability in Hu sheep. Following cold exposure, the microbial community of Hulunbuir sheep showed a decrease in the influence of stochastic processes on community assembly, with a corresponding increase in the role of environmental selection. Conversely, no such shift was evident in Hu sheep. Further transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct regulatory mechanisms between breeds. In Hu sheep, protein synthesis, energy metabolism, and thermogenesis pathways were substantially upregulated. By contrast, Hulunbuir sheep showed considerable upregulation of immune pathways and energy conservation through reduced ribosome synthesis. Correlation analysis indicated that butyrate holds a central position in both networks, with Hulunbuir sheep exhibiting a more complex and tightly regulated network involving SCFAs, microbiota, microbial functions, and transcriptomes. Partial least squares path modeling revealed that cold exposure substantially altered the cecal microbiota and transcriptomes of Hulunbuir sheep, affecting SCFAs and cytokines.

conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that under cold exposure, Hu sheep enhance acetate fermentation and rely on tissue thermogenesis for adaptation. By contrast, Hulunbuir sheep exhibit changes in microbial diversity and function, leading to increased propionate and butyrate metabolism. This may promote physiological energy conservation and innate immune defense, balancing heat loss and enhancing cold adaptation.

Indexed as

ButyratesCecumCold-Shock ResponseGastrointestinal MicrobiomePropionatesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacteriaCold TemperatureFatty Acids, VolatileFermentationSheepButyratesFatty Acids, VolatilePropionatesCecal microbiomeCold stressImmune responseShort-chain fatty acidsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40275300
PMCPMC12023611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.