ArticleBMC oral health2025
Digital and artificial intelligence-assisted cephalometric training effectively enhanced students' landmarking accuracy in preclinical orthodontic education.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilising a web-based e-learning platform for orthodontic case analysis training: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Orthodontic diagnosis and usability of the web-based e-learning application orthotrainer.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Implementing and evaluating a seminar-case learning model in postgraduate orthodontic education: perceived effectiveness, student experience, and influencing factors.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Development of an AI model to predict tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Digital intelligence in dental technology education: curriculum and practical teaching reform.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Reproducibility of AI in Cephalometric Landmark Detection: A Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Technologies and Materials in Oral Health and Dental Care of Pediatric Dentistry.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Orthodontic Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Teaching Application.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital cephalometric analyses, including those assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), are widely used in clinical practice. Similarly, computer-assisted learning has demonstrated teaching outcomes comparable to those of traditional methods in orthodontic education. However, the potential application of digital and AI-assisted cephalometric training in the preclinical education of orthodontic students remains unexplored. Cephalometric analysis is a fundamental skill for orthodontic students and practitioners. Therefore, this study aimed to integrate digital and AI-assisted cephalometric training into preclinical orthodontic education and evaluate its educational effectiveness.
methodsForty undergraduate students were grouped into pairs to use digital cephalometric training software. The students' landmarking abilities were evaluated by comparing their total scores before and after training on the same two lateral radiographs using digital cephalometric training software. The effectiveness of the software in improving landmarking accuracy was assessed objectively. Lateral radiographs of eight common patient types were selected. Twenty-four clinical training students from different grades used an AI-assisted cephalometric platform to analyze skeletal, dental, and soft tissue indicators. The accuracy of the measurements was compared among students in different grades.
resultsDigital cephalometric training, through real-time feedback and visual error-correction mechanisms, enabled students to quickly identify and correct errors in landmarking, significantly improving their accuracy. There was no significant difference in AI-assisted cephalometric analysis ability among students with varying levels of clinical experience.
conclusionsDigital cephalometric training effectively enhances students' landmarking accuracy in preclinical orthodontic education. AI-assisted cephalometry has the potential to minimize performance disparities among students with varying levels of clinical experience. Owing to the real-time feedback and self-directed learning features of digital tools, these technologies serve as valuable supplements to instructor-led training, potentially reducing educators' workload and accelerating skill acquisition in novice orthodontic students. However, these preliminary findings require further multicenter validation and long-term educational assessments while also considering the ethical implications of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.