ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
An imaging anatomical study on percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic spine via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transverse process-pedicle versus conventional transpedicular approach in percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and pilot meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative CT-Based Planning for Unilateral Pedicle Approach PVP Reduces Cement Leakage and Improves Radiological Outcomes in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.
methodsPVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A
resultsThe mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A
conclusionIn PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.