ArticleLipids in health and disease2025
The relationship of cardiometabolic index with bowel movement frequency: an NHANES-based cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior studies have indicated a notable link between gut health and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The cardiometabolic index (CMI), an innovative indicator of metabolic health, effectively predicts MetS. Bowel movement frequency (BMF) closely reflects gastrointestinal function and is a key sign of gut health. Nonetheless, the relationship between CMI and BMF is still unclear. Our research explores the possible association between these two variables.
methodsThis study employed 2005 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. The CMI for each participant was determined by triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the waist-to-hip ratio. Multiple regression, smooth curve fitting, and threshold effect analyses were employed to investigate the association between CMI and BMF. The association's stability across populations was assessed through subgroup analyses and interaction tests.
resultsThe study included 9,678 participants in total. After controlling for potential confounding variables, those in the uppermost CMI quartile had a 0.69 more increase in BMF than the bottom quartile (β = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.03). The trend analyses showed that BMF increased steadily with the advancement of the CMI quartiles (P for trend < 0.0001). Associations between CMI and BMF were shown to be nonlinear through smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analyses. Specifically, when CMI ranged from 4.97 to 11.75, a negative connection was observed (β = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.33, -0.23), while positive associations were identified in other ranges. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests indicated significant CMI and BMF association variations when stratified by depression and age categories (P for interaction < 0.05).
conclusionsThis research indicates that CMI is generally associated with an increase in BMF. However, when CMI ranges from 4.97 to 11.75, it is associated with a BMF decrease. Notably, the association of CMI and BMF is more potent in young, middle-aged, and depressed people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.