ArticleBMC health services research2025
Integrating HIV advanced disease management into a routine program setting: cohort from Mumbai, India.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advanced disease management (ADM) package, which aims to reduce morbidity and mortality in people with Advanced HIV disease (AHD, WHO stage III/IV and/or CD4 count < 200 cells/mm
methodsWe implemented the ADM package (screening, treatment, and prophylaxis for major opportunistic infections, rapid ART initiation, and ART adherence support) in 17 ART centers from October 2020 to December 2021. Treatment naïve and experienced persons with AHD, including children, were enrolled. We assessed the feasibility through coverage of ADM package components and reported the proportion of rapid ART initiation (≤ 7 days), cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, TB preventive treatment (TPT) for those eligible [(excluded active TB disease (n = 280) and those completed TPT prior to enrolment (n = 1,186)], TB-LAM screening (excluded current TB disease), and cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) assay (excluded children < 10 years of age). We used a point of care test for TB (LAM) and cryptococcus (CrAg) screening. We followed the prospective cohort for one year (through 31 July 2022) to document outcomes for survival and lost to follow- up (LTFU).
resultsWe identified 4,334 PLHIV with AHD and provided the full ADM package to 64% (2,779/4,334); 297 did not receive ADM (146 died, 151 LTFU), and 1,258 received routine standard of care (587 had TB, 366 were at decentralized sites, and 305 LAM/CrAg kits were not available) with existing ART center staff. Nearly 78% (385/494) of treatment naïve were rapidly initiated on ART. Nearly 82% (1,129/1,383) and 99% (2,751/2,779) received TPT and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, respectively. Of the eligible, 99% (2,508/2,524) and 98% (2,715/2,758) were screened for TB and cryptococcal infection, respectively. At the end of 12 months, 88% (2,458/2,779) were alive, 8% (210/2,779) died, and 4% (111/2,779) were LTFU. Mean survival time was significantly (p < 0.001) higher among treatment experienced people; 11.6 months (95% CI: 11.5,11.7) compared to treatment naïve people 10.8 months (95% CI: 10.5,11.0).
conclusionWith careful anticipatory planning, stakeholder engagement, and training, implementing the full ADM package is feasible in a routine program setting with existing human resources. Additional intensive case management may be necessary for the reduction of mortality among treatment naïve PLHIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.