ArticleBMC medical education2025
Improving medical students' learning strategies, management of workload and wellbeing: a mixed methods case study in undergraduate medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Psychological drivers and value perception of medical student participation in teaching evaluation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impact of growth mindset on college students' career decision-making self-efficacy: the chain-mediating roles of perceived social support and meaning in life.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transition from secondary education to university challenges students' learning strategies and academic performance, especially in self-directed, problem-based environments like medical school. Passive study methods often fail, while evidence-based strategies like retrieval practice, active learning, and growth mindset foster success. We evaluate a novel academic support programme (Academic Tutoring- (AT)) to enhance study skills, feedback use, and self-directed learning.
methodsWe developed and implemented AT for 1st year medical students, informed by the psychology of learning and behaviour change, AT aimed to support the development of self-efficacy and effective learning strategies during the transition into university. The programme involved meeting an Academic Tutor one-to-one once per term, and also as a group once per term. Academic Tutors engaged students in learner-centred conversations on study skills and professional development plus their wellbeing and welfare. A Likert questionnaire was designed to measure students' responses to the experiences and perceived outcomes of AT. We also measured self-efficacy and mindset. Qualitative data was gathered through open-ended response items. Demographic and socioeconomic data was also gathered.
resultsAT positively impacted time-management and learning strategies. 'Learning from successes and failures' and 'thinking how to achieve goals' were associated with a growth mindset. All outcome measures were associated with self-efficacy. We noted that students from a widening participation (WP) background tended to show higher growth mindset relative to those from a non-WP background (r = -0.223, p = 0.08) and female students reported higher engagement with the programme (r-0.294, p < 0.001). Students reported changes in behaviours and attitudes, and improved wellbeing.
conclusionsProviding medical students with the tools to change their approach to work and revision can improve subjective reports of time management, implementation of successful learning strategies and wellbeing. Successful outcomes were associated with self-efficacy and mindset. These are modifiable constructs, and this work suggests that focussing conversations on self-efficacy and mindset may be beneficial for supporting positive behaviour change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.