Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275217›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Effects of phytic acid and etidronic acid using continuous and sequential chelation on the removal of smear layer, dentin microhardness, and push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cement.

Ecehan Hazar, Ahmet Hazar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07353008 (Effect of Different Chelation Protocols on the Healing of Periapical Lesions in Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07353008 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effect of Different Chelation Protocols on the Healing of Periapical Lesions in Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMustafa Kemal UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled63ConditionsChronic Apical PeriodontitisArmsFinal irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, Final irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 9% HEBP, Irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl-9% HEBP during both preparation and final irrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ecehan HazarDepartment of Endodontics, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Dentistry, Zonguldak, 67600, Türkiye. ece.handemir@hotmail.com.
Ahmet HazarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Dentistry, Zonguldak, 67600, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study assessed the effects of sequential and continuous chelation using phytic acid and etidronic acid on smear layer removal, microhardness, and push-out bond strength (PBS) at radicular dentin.

methodsOne hundred twenty single-rooted teeth were selected. Thirty teeth were split longitudinally, and initial microhardness was measured. The roots were then divided into six groups. In sequential chelation, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used for 20 min, followed by 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 9% etidronic acid (HEDP), or 2.5% phytic acid (PA) for 2 min, while no chelator was applied in the control group. In continuous chelation, etidronic acid (DR HEDP) or phytic acid (DR PA) was mixed with NaOCl and applied for 20 min. Final microhardness values were measured, and the change was calculated as a percentage. Mid-root sections were obtained from the 60 teeth for the PBS test and divided into six groups. Irrigants were applied as in the microhardness test. Sections obturated with calcium silicate cement. PBS values were measured, and the types of failures were analyzed. Thirty teeth were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In sequential chelation, 2.5% NaOCl irrigation was performed during instrumentation, followed by 17% EDTA, 9% HEDP, or 2.5% PA for 2 min, while no chelator was applied in the control group. In continuous chelation, DR HEDP or DR PA was mixed with NaOCl and used during instrumentation. Images were taken, and smear layer scores were recorded. The PBS data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and the alterations in microhardness and remaining smear layer were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test. The pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Tukey's HSD post hoc test. The failure patterns and smear scores were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test (α = 0.05).

resultsResults showed that DR HEDP (4.02 ± 0.68%) caused the least reduction in microhardness. DR HEDP (10.26 ± 1.74 MPa) exhibited the highest bond strength, followed by PA (7.97 ± 0.92 MPa) and DR PA (7.74 ± 1.16 MPa). Failure patterns did not differ significantly. Lower percentages of the remaining smear layer area were observed in the DR PA (26.7 ± 18%), PA (24.2 ± 9.8%), and DR HEDP (37.1 ± 16.5%) groups compared to the others.

conclusionsThe use of etidronic acid with the continuous chelation technique and phytic acid with the sequential chelation technique may be an alternative method to sequential EDTA irrigation.

Indexed as

Calcium CompoundsChelating AgentsDental BondingDental CementsDentinEtidronic AcidPhytic AcidSilicatesSmear LayerDental Stress AnalysisEdetic AcidHardnessHumansMaterials TestingRoot Canal IrrigantsRoot Canal PreparationCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateChelating AgentsDental CementsEdetic AcidEtidronic AcidPhytic AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsSilicatesSodium HypochloriteContinuous chelationEtidronic acidMicrohardnessPhytic acidPush-out bond strengthSequential chelationSmear layer

Identifiers

PMID40275217
PMCPMC12023362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.