Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275183›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Equality, equity, diversity, and inclusion principles: how should we apply these to statistical methodology research?

Ellesha Smith, Carol Akroyd, Rebecca Barnes, Emma Beeston, Jonathan Broomfield, Sylwia Bujkiewicz, Natalie Darko, Christopher Newby, Mark J Rutherford, Aiden Smith and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ellesha SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. eas24@leicester.ac.uk.
Carol AkroydNIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester, UK.
Rebecca BarnesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Emma BeestonNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Jonathan BroomfieldDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sylwia BujkiewiczDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Natalie DarkoNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Christopher NewbyNIHR Research Support Service (RSS) Hub, delivered by the University of Leicester and Partners, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Mark J RutherfordDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Aiden SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Rachael StannardDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Freya TyrerNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Laura J GrayDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of equality, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is to ensure fair treatment, equal opportunities, equitable outcomes, and representation. The NIHR Research Design Service (RDS) EDI toolkit ( https://www.rssleicesterresources.org.uk/edi-toolkit ) helps researchers embed EDI throughout their work. This study evaluated the applicability of the RDS EDI toolkit for statistical methodology research and proposed adaptations to enable statistical methodologists to embed EDI in their research.

methodsA full-day meeting was held to consider how the RDS EDI toolkit could inform the inclusion of EDI principles in statistical methodology research. Twelve individuals attended from the University of Leicester and the NIHR Research Support Service (RSS) Hub delivered by the University of Leicester and Partners. At the meeting, definitions of statistical methodology research and EDI were agreed. The RDS EDI Toolkit was interrogated to identify relevant aspects and additional considerations for statistical methodology research.

resultsOverall, the RDS EDI toolkit was valuable for incorporating EDI in statistical methodology research. Five recommendations to supplement the toolkit are proposed to reflect specific EDI challenges for statistical methodology research. Statistical methodology researchers should: 1. Perform formal assessments of the required resources for maximising EDI from the outset of statistical methodology research projects, including consideration of research team, training, patient and public involvement, and appropriate budgeting. 2. Conduct prospective and retrospective context-specific evaluations of the impact of their methodological research on exacerbating or reducing inequalities. 3. Evaluate the selection of data sets, work with multiple, diverse databases, or use data sets that have undergone equality impact assessments. 4. Clearly communicate EDI assessments and limitations, including which data sets are used and their purpose, such as illustrating or comparing methods, informing simulations, or guiding clinical practice. 5. Incorporate EDI in dissemination activities and advocate for EDI principles in the peer review process.

conclusionsEmbedding EDI principles throughout statistical methodology research will improve its relevance and quality, better serve the public, and build public trust. It is essential that statistical methodologists strive towards equity in all aspects of their work. This paper demonstrates the value of the NIHR RDS EDI toolkit for statistical methodology research and encourages methodologists to adopt the recommendations in this paper. Further extensions to this work are needed to seek the wider views and experiences of statistical methodologists and public contributors from diverse and under-represented groups.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityHealth EquityResearch DesignDiversity, Equity, InclusionHumansDiversityEqualityEquityInclusionStatistical methodologyToolkit

Identifiers

PMID40275183
PMCPMC12023504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.