ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Prediction of significant congenital heart disease in infants and children using continuous wavelet transform and deep convolutional neural network with 12-lead electrocardiogram.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Congenital heart disease diagnosis using machine learning: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) affects approximately 1% of newborns and is a leading cause of mortality in early childhood. Despite the importance of early detection, current screening methods, such as pulse oximetry and auscultation, have notable limitations, particularly in identifying non-cyanotic CHD. (AI)-assisted electrocardiography (ECG) analysis offers a cost-effective alternative to conventional CHD detection. However, most existing models have been trained on older children, limiting their generalizability to infants and young children. This study developed an AI model trained on real-world ECG data for the detection of hemodynamically significant CHD in children under five years of age.
methodsECG data was retrospectively collected from 1,035 patients under five years old at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan (2013-2020). Based on ECG findings, patients were categorized into the following groups: normal heart structure (NOR), non-significant right heart disease (RHA), significant right heart disease (RHB), non-significant left heart disease (LHA), and significant left heart disease (LHB). ECG signals underwent preprocessing using continuous wavelet transformation and segmentation into 2-s intervals for data augmentation. Transfer learning was applied using three pre-trained deep learning models: ResNet- 18, InceptionResNet-V2, and NasNetMobile. Model performance was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsAmong the tested models, the model based on ResNet-18 demonstrated the best overall performance in predicting clinically significant CHD, achieving accuracy of 73.9%, an F1 score of 75.8%, and an AUC of 81.0% in differentiating significant from non-significant CHD. InceptionResNet-V2 performed well in detecting left heart disease but was computationally intensive. The proposed AI model significantly outperformed conventional ECG interpretation by pediatric cardiologists (accuracy 67.1%, sensitivity 71.6%).
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of AI-assisted ECG analysis for CHD screening in young children. The ResNet-18-based model outperformed conventional ECG evaluation, suggesting its feasibility as a supplementary tool for early CHD detection. Future studies should focus on multi-center validation, inclusion of more CHD subtypes, and integration with other screening modalities to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.