Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275062›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Species responses to weather anomalies depend on local adaptation and range position.

Yolanda Melero, Luke C Evans, Mikko Kuussaari, Reto Schmucki, Constantí Stefanescu, David B Roy, Tom H Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yolanda MeleroDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ymelero@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4337-1448
Luke C EvansSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Mikko KuussaariFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Nature Solutions Unit, Helsinki, Finland.
Reto SchmuckiUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-7553
Constantí StefanescuNatural Science Museum of Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
David B RoyUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331
Tom H OliverSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-7313

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (H2020 Excellent Science - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) 795890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species show intra-specific variation in responses to climate change linked to adaptation to the local climatic conditions. Likewise, species are expected to be more resilient to climate change at the centre of their bioclimatic niche, but this pattern is not general. We show that species sensitivity to climatic anomalies varies with local adaptation and the position in the bioclimatic niche, using long-term butterfly monitoring data for 34 species. Climatic anomalies negatively affected all populations of locally adapted species. Globally adapted species were positively or negatively affected by climatic anomalies, depending on population location and direction of anomalies. These responses impacted population trends as globally adapted species showed steeper declines at the trailing margin. Surprisingly, locally adapted species showed stable abundances at the trailing margin, but declines at the leading; which could be explained by the with the 'warmer is better' hypothesis where thermodynamics limit insect performance at cooler conditions.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalButterfliesClimate ChangeWeatherAnimalsEcosystemSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40275062
PMCPMC12022152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.