ArticleScientific reports2025
Neurodynamic robust adaptive UWB localization algorithm with NLOS mitigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heteroscedastic Bias-Robust Projected Gradient Descent for UWB Localization in Complex Indoor Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the robust localization in mixed line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) indoor environments, we proposed a max-min optimization estimator from a measurement model and introduced an adaptive loss function to optimize the estimation. However, this estimator is highly nonconvex leading to difficulties in solving it directly. We employed the neurodynamic to solve it. In addition, we checked the local equilibrium stability of the corresponding projective neural network model. The proposed algorithm does not require any prerequisites compared to existing algorithms, which either require knowledge of the magnitude of the NLOS bias or a priori distinction between LOS and NLOS. We proposed an adaptive distance error upper bound method to improve the accuracy of localization model. Tested in representative numerical simulation and real environments, our proposed robust adaptive positioning algorithm outperforms existing methods in terms of localization accuracy and robustness, especially in severe NLOS environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.