Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Long-term cardiovascular risk and mortality associated with uric acid to HDL-C ratio: a 20-year cohort study in adults over 40.

Ying Cui, Wen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying CuiDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School and Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Graduate School, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 02841, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-3799
Wen ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, No.58, Changsheng South Road, Taicang, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. zhangwenqazwsx@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4234-4444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and mortality remain significant public health challenges, especially among middle-aged and older adults. However, their relationship with Uric Acid to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio (UHR) has not been extensively studied in the US population. This study aimed to examine these associations in adults aged ≥ 40 based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. 29,742 participants' data in NHANES between 1999 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the associations between UHR and various CVD outcomes. Among the participants, 4,505 (15.15%) reported a history of CVD. A positive association was observed between UHR and the risk of total CVD, including coronary heart disease, heart attack, heart failure, angina pectoris, and stroke (P

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLUric AcidAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCholesterol, HDLUric AcidAll-cause mortalityCardiovascular disease mortalityCardiovascular diseasesMiddle-aged and older adultsUHR

Identifiers

PMID40275048
PMCPMC12022283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.