Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determining minimum cuff pressure required to reduce arterial blood flow at rest.

Hiago L R Souza, Michal Wilk, Géssyca T de Oliveira, Marta Bichowska-Pawęska, Bernardo P Bernardes, Eduardo O Dos Prazeres, Gustavo B Camilo, Philip Hurst, Moacir Marocolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiago L R SouzaDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Michal WilkInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
Géssyca T de OliveiraDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Marta Bichowska-PawęskaFaculty of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Bernardo P BernardesDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Eduardo O Dos PrazeresDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Gustavo B CamiloDepartment of Anatomy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Philip HurstSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
Moacir MarocoloDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil. isamjf@gmail.com.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308138/2022-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the minimum cuff pressure to induce alterations in the brachial and popliteal blood flow (BF). Forty-two healthy men underwent an incremental cuff pressure protocol at rest. The cuff was positioned at the proximal part of the right arm (9 cm width, brachial artery) and thigh (13 cm width, superficial femoral artery) in a randomized order. Pressure increments started at 0 mmHg, increased by 20 mmHg up to 100 mmHg, and then by 10 mmHg until total occlusion of BF. Each pressure was held for 30 s to stabilize BF and measurements were carried out on brachial (BA) and popliteal (PA) arteries using a 2-D B-mode ultrasound. Mean arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was 161 ± 18 mmHg in BA and 150 ± 15 mmHg for the PA. At 20-100 mmHg, the mean BF changes were 4% (BA) and 11% (PA), without significant BF reductions compared to baseline values. Reductions in BF vs. baseline (p < 0.05) were found from 120 mmHg (BA) and 110 mmHg (PA) cuff pressures. Calculations of the minimal clinically important differences showed meaningful changes beginning at 110 mmHg for BA and 100 mmHg for PA. Experimental approaches requiring BF restriction should use cuff pressures greater than 69% (BA) and 67% (PA) of AOP to promote significant reductions in blood flow.

Indexed as

Brachial ArteryPopliteal ArteryRegional Blood FlowRestAdultBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureFemoral ArteryHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePressureYoung AdultArterial occlusion pressureIschemiaReperfusionTourniquets

Identifiers

PMID40275037
PMCPMC12022181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.