Observational studyScientific reports2025
Rising public costs of preterm infant hospitalization in South Korea from a nationwide observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The social and economic burden of retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and health policy perspectives in a transnational narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Analysis of clinical risk factors of premature infants in Chinese women based on anemia status.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Healthcare resource utilisation and costs in infants with confirmed respiratory syncytial virus infections: a national population cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the decline in the overall birth rate, increasing preterm births and associated medical costs pose a national concern. We analyze hospitalization costs covered by national public insurance for preterm infants. Population-based data, obtained from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), which is operated by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, were used for the study. Preterm births from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2020 were included, using International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th edition (P07.2, extremely preterm < 28 weeks gestational age, P07.3, non-extremely preterm). The primary outcomes related to cost from the first hospitalization due to preterm births and medication, and laboratory, radiological, and functional tests by gestational age and birth weight. Additionally, we assessed the readmission rates of preterm infants and the associated medical costs. A total of 5,312,886 live infants were born, of which 90,575 were claimed as preterm birth hospitalization. The total medical cost per patient increased almost three-fold from $7,390.90 to $20,209.59 from 2008 to 2020; for the extremely preterm group, it increased four-fold ($13,961.03 to $55,984.47). The readmission rate within 90 days of discharge was 62.5%; however, a greater proportion of the extremely preterm, as compared to the non-extremely preterm (16.1% vs. 8.32%, P < 0.001) group was readmitted within 30 days. The extremely preterm group also incurred higher costs associated with readmission (mean $4293.8 vs. $2975.4, P < 0.001). This study reveals not only the increase in preterm birth rate in South Korea, but also in the associated medical costs. Further attention should be paid to efficient resource allocation at the national level to relieve the medical burden of preterm births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.