ArticleScientific reports2025
Age-period-cohort effects of adult cigarette smoking in the united States, 1971-2020.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in Mortality Related to Lung Cancer and Secondary Brain Metastasis Among Older Adults in the United States From 1999 to 2020; Insights From CDC-WONDER.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Wildfire smoke PMScience advances · 2026Article
- Changes in combustible cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery system use among people with and without schizophrenia spectrum disorders in the USA (2016-2023).Tobacco control · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Tobacco Exposure on Low Back Pain-Related Disability-Adjusted Life Years in China: Trends From 1990-2021 and Projections for the Next 15 years Using ARIMA Modeling.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Trends in type 2 diabetes-related deaths and disability-adjusted life years among smoking middle-aged and elderly adults in China, 1990-2021.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rates of cigarette use among American adults have dropped substantially throughout the last six decades, yet smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States. It is crucial to identify the putative time-varying population-level factors of age, period, and cohort that influenced the decrease in smoking prevalence so we can maintain the downward trend. We used 49 years of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and hierarchical age-period-cohort (HAPC) analysis to examine lifecycle, historical, and generational distribution of smoking among Americans aged 18-74 years old. The prevalence of smoking has declined tremendously from 1971 to 2020 because American adults over the age of ~ 27 had a lower probability of cigarette use, but the rates of decrease have been unequal among birth cohorts. We uncovered the putative temporal contributors to population-level decreases in the prevalence of current smoking among American adults over the last nearly fifty years. Policy-makers ought to prioritize tobacco control efforts that focus on young adults, and should address the cohort-specific challenges in order to maintain the downward trend in smoking prevalence and further reduce the number of preventable premature deaths due to cigarette use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.