ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Pathomechanics, Current Understanding and Emerging Directions: A Perspective for 2025 and Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients undergoing open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have a high risk of post-operative complications. However, there are no widely used tools to predict surgical risk in this population. We used machine learning (ML) techniques to develop automated algorithms that predict 30-day outcomes following open AAA repair. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, non-ruptured open AAA repair between 2011 and 2021. Input features included 35 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death). We split our data into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 ML models were trained using pre-operative features with logistic regression as the baseline comparator. Overall, 3,620 patients were included. Thirty-day MACE occurred in 311 (8.6%) patients. The best performing prediction model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.89-0.91). Comparatively, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.66 (0.64-0.68). The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.03. Our automated ML algorithm can help guide risk-mitigation strategies for patients being considered for open AAA repair to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.