Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Coping with five mismatches between policy and practice in hemiboreal forest stands and landscapes.

Michael Manton, Raimundas Petrokas, Šarūnas Kukcinavičius, Silvija Šaudytė-Manton, Charles Ruffner, Per Angelstam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Factors affecting the genetic diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael MantonVytautas Magnus University, Studentu Str. 13, Kauno r, Akademija, LT-53362, Lithuania. michael.manton@vdu.lt.
Raimundas PetrokasLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Forestry, Department of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Kaunas, LT-53101, Lithuania.
Šarūnas KukcinavičiusVytautas Magnus University, Studentu Str. 13, Kauno r, Akademija, LT-53362, Lithuania.
Silvija Šaudytė-MantonVytautas Magnus University, Studentu Str. 13, Kauno r, Akademija, LT-53362, Lithuania.
Charles RuffnerSchool of Forestry and Horticulture, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 62901-4411, USA.
Per AngelstamDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Inland Norway, Campus Evenstad, Koppang, N-2480, Norway.

Funding

LIFE programme LIFE23-NAT-LT-LIFE-ForestHabitatLT/101147231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of forest ecosystems revolves around the long-term persistence and resilience of their components, structures and functions. Focusing on Europe's hemiboreal forests, we evaluate mismatches between naturally dynamic forest ecosystems and current forest management systems forming obstacles for developing closer-to-nature forest management. Using Lithuania as a case study, we (i) quantify the main forest vegetation community types using soil types, ground layer flora, and tree and shrub species, (ii) review the relationships among these vegetation communities and their predicted natural disturbance regimes, (iii) analyse changes in tree species composition, (iv) compare the life expectancy of trees with harvest age, and (v) compare the contemporary stand age distributions with predicted natural disturbance regimes stand age distributions. Results show five mismatches between current practices and policy visions. Despite identifying 17 natural hemiboreal forest vegetation communities only eight dominant stand tree species were reported in current forestry reporting. The areal extents of three different natural disturbance regimes were: gap dynamics - mixed broadleaved forests on wet-mesic very fertile sites (22%), succession - mixed spruce forests on fertile sites (49%), and cohort dynamics - Scots pine forest on poor fertility sites (30%). Changes in tree species composition showed declines of primary tree species of 12-71% for the three disturbance regimes. The ratio of natural expected life expectancy to harvest age varied from two-fold to eight-fold across different tree species. Stand age distributions in naturally dynamic forests and managed forests revealed a current dramatic deficit of old-growth stands. Coping with the five identified mismatches between natural forests and current forest management requires multiple solutions: (1) closer-to-nature forest management that emulate natural disturbance regimes at tree and stand scales, (2) landscape planning, and (3) multi-level governance approaches.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsTreesBiodiversityEcosystemLithuaniaSoilSoilCloser-to-nature forest managementForest ageForest disturbance regimesForest dynamicsStructural legaciesSustainabilityVegetation communities

Identifiers

PMID40274991
PMCPMC12022097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.