ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized machine learning mechanism for big data healthcare system to predict disease risk factor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is becoming more and more common in modern society because of factors like stress, inadequate diets, etc. Early identification of heart disease risk factors is essential as it allows for treatment plans that may reduce the risk of severe consequences and enhance patient outcomes. Predictive methods have been used to estimate the risk factor, but they often have drawbacks such as improper feature selection, overfitting, etc. To overcome this, a novel Deep Red Fox belief prediction system (DRFBPS) has been introduced and implemented in Python software. Initially, the data was collected and preprocessed to enhance its quality, and the relevant features were selected using red fox optimization. The selected features analyze the risk factors, and DRFBPS makes the prediction. The effectiveness of the DRFBPS model is validated using Accuracy, F score, Precision, AUC, Recall, and error rate. The findings demonstrate the use of DRFBPS as a practical tool in healthcare analytics by showing the rate at which it produces accurate and reliable predictions. Additionally, its application in healthcare systems, including clinical decisions and remote patient monitoring, proves its real-world applicability in enhancing early diagnosis and preventive care measures. The results prove DRFBPS to be a potential tool in healthcare analytics, providing a strong framework for predictive modeling in heart disease risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.