Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274937›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using pet insurance claims to predict occurrence of vector-borne and zoonotic disease in humans in the United States.

Janice O'Brien, Aliya McCullough, Christian Debes, Audrey Ruple

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting Lyme Disease: A One Health Approach.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janice O'BrienDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Aliya McCulloughFetch Insurance Services, LLC, New York, NY, USA.
Christian DebesSpryfox GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
Audrey RupleDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. aruple@vt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking a One Health approach to infectious diseases common to both dogs and people, pet insurance claims from 2008 to 2022 in the United States were compared to publicly available CDC-based data on human cases for Lyme disease, giardia, and Valley Fever (coccidioidomycosis). Despite having very different causative agents and etiologies, the disease trends for these three diseases were very similar between people and dogs both geographically and temporally. We furthermore demonstrated that adding dog data as a predictor variable in addition to the human data improves prediction models for those same diseases when investigating incidence over time. With machine learning prediction tools for the pet insurance to predict changes in disease incidence sooner and give public health officials more time to prepare, pet insurance data could be a helpful tool to predict and detect diseases by estimating even earlier the effects of these common exposure diseases on human health. We also show the spatiotemporal distribution of intestinal worm diagnoses in dogs, and while it could not be directly compared to human data because the corresponding disease in humans (soil-transmitted helminths) has not been well monitored recently. However, these data can help inform researchers and public health workers.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesPetsVector Borne DiseasesZoonosesAnimalsDogsGiardiasisHumansIncidenceLyme DiseaseMachine LearningUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40274937
PMCPMC12022325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.