ArticleScientific reports2025
Phylogeny and evolutionary dynamics of the Rubia genus based on the chloroplast genome of Rubia tibetica.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bridging in vitro bioactivities and in silico insights of Rubia cordifolia L. (Rubiaceae) leaf extracts for therapeutic applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic relationship based on DNA barcodes and comparative analysis of phytochemical contents among Rhynchostylis orchids in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the medicinally important plantMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative plastome analysis reveals evolutionary dynamics and codon usage patterns in Bidens (Asteraceae).Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rubia tibetica, a well-known medicinal plant, holds significant medicinal value. In this study, we sequenced and assembled the complete chloroplast genome of R. tibetica and conducted comparative analyses with four other Rubia species to provide insights into genome structure, selective pressure, and phylogenetic relationships. The chloroplast genome of R. tibetica was 154,901 bp in length and exhibited a typical quadripartite circular structure. Comparative analysis revealed a highly conserved genome structure among Rubia species, with genome sizes ranging from 153,555 bp to 155,108 bp and a GC content of approximately 37%. Codon usage analysis indicated a preference for A/U-ending codons. Selective pressure analysis identified relaxed selection in genes such as rps15 and petA, suggesting species-specific adaptive strategies. Two hypervariable regions, rps16-trnQ and psaJ-rps18, were experimentally validated as potential molecular markers through PCR amplification and sequencing. However, sequencing results of the rps16-trnQ region differed from the reference chloroplast genome, requiring further investigation. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum likelihood (ML) based on the complete chloroplast genome sequences of five Rubia species and confirmed the monophyly of the Rubia genus, with R. tibetica occupying a basal position. This suggesting the retention of ancestral traits and adaptation to the unique environment of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Molecular dating analysis further revealed divergence times consistent with geological and climatic events in the region. These findings provide critical insights into the evolutionary dynamics of Rubia species and offer valuable resources for their classification, conservation, and medicinal application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.