ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing neural responses to cutaneous heat and pressure pain in healthy participants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Replicable and Generalizable Neuroimaging-Based Indicator of Pain Sensitivity Across Individuals.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Neural basis of intensity-dependent brain activity in response to mechanical stimulation and the level of pain sensitivity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though acute pain comes in many different shapes and forms, a lot of experimental pain studies predominantly employ cutaneous heat pain. This makes a comparison between different pain types and the link between findings from these experimental studies to clinical pain difficult. To bridge this gap, we investigated both cuff pressure pain and cutaneous heat pain using a within-subject design in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Noxious stimuli were applied with a 17-s duration at three different intensities above the pain threshold using a thermode and a computer-controlled cuff pressure device. Both pain modalities led to contralateral activation in the anterior insula and parietal operculum. Heat pain showed greater activation in the precentral gyrus, pontine reticular nucleus, and dorsal posterior insula, whilst pressure pain showed greater activation in the primary somatosensory cortex and bilateral superior parietal lobules. Most importantly, the time course of the fMRI signal changes differed between modalities, with pressure pain peaking in the first stimulus half, whereas heat pain led to a prolonged and increasing response across the stimulus duration with a peak in the second stimulus half. Our findings suggest that pressure and heat pain lead to common as well as different (temporal) activation patterns in key pain processing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.