Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Managing free-roaming domestic dog populations using surgical sterilisation: a randomised controlled trial.

H R Fielding, K A Fernandes, Amulya V R, D Belgayer, A Misquita, R Kenny, A D Gibson, L Gamble, B M C Bronsvoort, R J Mellanby and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

H R FieldingThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. helen.fielding@ed.ac.uk.
K A FernandesWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
Amulya V RWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
D BelgayerWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
A MisquitaDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Government of Goa and the Goa Veterinary Association, Pashusamwardhan Bhavan, Patto, Panaji, Goa, 403401, India.
R KennyDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Government of Goa and the Goa Veterinary Association, Pashusamwardhan Bhavan, Patto, Panaji, Goa, 403401, India.
A D GibsonWorldwide Veterinary Service, 4 Castle Street, Cranborne, Dorset, BH21 5PZ, UK.
L GambleWorldwide Veterinary Service, 4 Castle Street, Cranborne, Dorset, BH21 5PZ, UK.
B M C BronsvoortThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
R J MellanbyThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
I HandelThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
D RivettThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
K NewmanSchool of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
R KingSchool of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
I SayyedWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
A SayedWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
K LadWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
M YaragudaWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
A D ParateWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
M K BalagaliWorldwide Veterinary Service, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.
S MazeriThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/RL/230002DDogs Trust Canine Welfare Grant R45810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-roaming domestic dogs (FRDs) are among the most abundant carnivores on earth and have coexisted with humans for over 15,000 years, yet increases in negative interactions and the transmission of zoonotic diseases, precipitates calls for population management. Despite significant investment in FRD sterilisation in India, where rabies is endemic, there is limited evidence of its impact on reducing FRD population sizes. Therefore, robust evaluation of the effectiveness of fertility control programmes is necessary. To address this, we implemented a Before After Control Intervention (BACI) framework in the first multi-site randomised controlled trial for the sterilisation of FRDs. We conducted single intensive sterilisation campaigns in five areas, achieving female sterilisation coverages of 58-66%. We observed a decrease in puppies and lactating females and a reduction in residents' reports of barking, a common problem associated with FRDs. There were no significant differences in adult FRD counts between intervention and control sites during the 2-year follow-up. However, unmeasured immigration into and emigration out of study areas may have confounded counts. One-off, albeit intense, sterilisation campaigns in open populations require substantial investment and are unlikely to reduce population size in isolation, though there may be some reduction in problematic behaviours and improved animal welfare.

Indexed as

Sterilization, ReproductiveAnimalsDogsFemaleIndiaCanineFertility controlFree-ranging dogNeuterPopulation managementStray

Identifiers

PMID40274918
PMCPMC12022150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.