Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274856›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Science acceleration and accessibility with self-driving labs.

Richard B Canty, Jeffrey A Bennett, Keith A Brown, Tonio Buonassisi, Sergei V Kalinin, John R Kitchin, Benji Maruyama, Robert G Moore, Joshua Schrier, Martin Seifrid and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Data-Driven Materials Science for Energy-Sustainable Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Generative Models for Crystalline Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Richard B CantyDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-2743
Jeffrey A BennettDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Keith A BrownDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-2018
Tonio BuonassisiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sergei V KalininMaterials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-6152
John R KitchinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2625-9232
Benji MaruyamaAir Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA.
Robert G MooreMaterials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1608-5411
Joshua SchrierDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-1657
Martin SeifridDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0058
Shijing SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-1390
Tejs VeggeDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1484-0284
Milad AbolhasaniDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. abolhasani@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-3085

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2332452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of scientific research, the complexity of global challenges demands innovative approaches to experimental planning and execution. Self-Driving Laboratories (SDLs) automate experimental tasks in chemical and materials sciences and the design and selection of experiments to optimize research processes and reduce material usage. This perspective explores improving access to SDLs via centralized facilities and distributed networks. We discuss the technical and collaborative challenges in realizing SDLs' potential to enhance human-machine and human-human collaboration, ultimately fostering a more inclusive research community and facilitating previously untenable research projects.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingLaboratoriesCooperative BehaviorHumans

Identifiers

PMID40274856
PMCPMC12022019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.