Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

EEG-based epilepsy detection using CNN-SVM and DNN-SVM with feature dimensionality reduction by PCA.

Yousra Berrich, Zouhair Guennoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yousra BerrichSmart Communications Research Team ERSC, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohammed 5 University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco. yousraberrich@gmail.com.
Zouhair GuennounSmart Communications Research Team ERSC, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohammed 5 University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on epilepsy detection using hybrid CNN-SVM and DNN-SVM models, combined with feature dimensionality reduction through PCA. The goal is to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of these models in accurately identifying epileptic patterns. The models were evaluated on two benchmark EEG databases: Epileptic Seizure Recognition and BONN, to ensure robustness and generalization. The integration of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) with Support Vector Machines (SVM) is explored, with a particular emphasis on the role of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in simplifying feature dimensions. In terms of accuracy, for the Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset, the CNN model achieved a rate of 99.04%, while the DNN model obtained 96.91%. For the BONN dataset, the CNN model achieved an accuracy of 99.78%, and the DNN model reached 96.97%. The introduction of PCA and SVM improved the accuracy of the CNN-SVM-PCA model to 99.42% for the Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset and 99.96% for the BONN dataset. However, the integration of PCA into the DNN-SVM model led to a significant improvement in accuracy, with a gain of 0.36% for the Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset and 3.07% for the BONN dataset.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEpilepsyNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualDimensionality ReductionHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisConvolutional Neural Networks (CNN)Deep Neural Networks (DNN)Electroencephalogram (EEG)Epilepsy detectionPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA)Support Vector Machines (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID40274853
PMCPMC12022175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.