ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Tablet-based arithmetic fluency assessment reveals developments in math cognition and math achievement from childhood to adolescence.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediating role of physical fitness in the relationship between 24-h movement guidelines and arithmetic fluency in adolescents: the MOVESCHOOL study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Contextualizing Socioeconomic Status Effects on Adolescent Brain Structure and Cognitive Skills: Evidence From the ABCD Study.Developmental science · 2026Article
- Math and verbal fluency across adulthood provide insights into aging and individual differences.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arithmetic fluency is regarded as a foundational math skill, typically measured as a single construct with pencil-and-paper-based timed assessments. We introduce a tablet-based assessment of single-digit fluency that captures individual trial response times across several embedded experimental contrasts of interest. A large (n = 824) cohort of 3rd- 7th grade students (ages 7-13 years) completed this task, revealing effects of operation and problem size in "common" problems (i.e., 5 + 3) often examined in studies of mathematical cognition. We also characterize performance on "exceptional" problems (i.e., 4 + 4), which are typically included in fluency tests, yet excluded from most cognitive studies. Overall, individuals demonstrated higher fluency on exceptional problems compared to common problems. However, common problems better predicted standardized tests scores and exhibited distinct patterns of speed-accuracy tradeoffs relative to exceptional problems. The affordances of tablet-based assessment to quantify multiple cognitive dynamics within chained fluency testspresent several advantages over traditional assessments, thus enriching the study of arithmetic fluency development at scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.