ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel stroke classification model based on EEG feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Electroencephalographic Biomarkers as Predictors of Post-Stroke Cognitive Outcomes in Patients with Cerebral Infarction: Literature Review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is the leading cause of disability and death worldwide. It severely affects patients' quality of life and imposes a huge burden on the society in general. The diagnosis of stroke relies predominantly on the use of neuroimaging. The identification of stroke using electroencephalogram (EEG) in the clinical assessment of stroke has been underutilized. An EEG feature fusion based light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) model was proposed to achieve a fast diagnosis of non-stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. This study aims to capture the essential difference between non-stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. An optimal fusion feature set originated from approximate entropy and fuzzy entropy of EEG signal was constructed. To verify the effectiveness of the EEG fusion feature, the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator optimized LightGBM classifier (TPELGBM) was used for the classification. The ZJU4H EEG dataset used for analysis in this study was obtained from the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, China. The proposed ApFu-TPELGBM model exhibited excellent classification results, which achieved a precision of 0.9676, recall of 0.9669, and f1-score of 0.9672. To our knowledge, it was the most accurate classifier for EEG-based stroke diagnosis so far. The ApFu-TPELGBM model can determine the stroke type anywhere EEG signals can be collected, even before the patient is admitted to a hospital. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of stroke using EEG signals may become a promising approach in the clinical assessment of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.