Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274843›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of automated foul detection in football using deep learning architectures.

Abdallah Rabee, Zakaria Anwar, Ahmed AbdelMoety, Ahmed Abdelsallam, Mahmoud Ali

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdallah RabeeSports Health Sciences Department, Faculty of Physical Education, South Valley University, Qena, 1464091, Egypt.
Zakaria AnwarSports Training and Kinesiology Sciences Department, Faculty of Physical Education, Suez University, Suez, 43512, Egypt.
Ahmed AbdelMoetyElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt.
Ahmed AbdelsallamSports Health Sciences Department, Faculty of Physical Education, South Valley University, Qena, 1464091, Egypt.
Mahmoud AliSports Health Sciences Department, Faculty of Physical Education, South Valley University, Qena, 1464091, Egypt. mahmoued.elsadek@phed.svu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated foul detection in football represents a challenging task due to the dynamic nature of the game, the variability in player movements, and the ambiguity in differentiating fouls from regular physical contact. This study presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of eight state-of-the-art Deep Learning (DL) architectures - EfficientNetV2, ResNet50, VGG16, Xception, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, InceptionResNetV2, and DenseNet121 - applied to the task of automated foul detection in football. The models were trained and evaluated using a curated dataset comprising 7000 images, which was split into 70% for training (4,900 images), 20% for validation (1,400 images), and 10% for testing (700 images). To ensure fair evaluation, the test set was balanced to contain 350 images depicting foul events and 350 images representing non-foul scenarios, although perfect balance was subject to class distribution constraints. Performance was assessed across multiple metrics, including test accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The results demonstrate that InceptionResNetV2 achieved the highest test accuracy of 87.57% and a strong F1-score of 0.8966, closely followed by DenseNet121, which attained the highest precision of 0.9786 and an AUC of 0.9641, indicating superior discriminatory power. Lightweight models such as MobileNetV2 also performed competitively, highlighting their potential for real-time deployment. The findings highlight the strengths and trade-offs between model complexity, accuracy, and generalizability, underscoring the viability of integrating DL architectures into existing football officiating systems, such as the Video Assistant Referee (VAR). Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of model explainability through techniques such as Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping++ (GradCAM++), ensuring that automated decisions can be accompanied by interpretable visual evidence. This comparative evaluation serves as a foundation for future research aimed at enhancing real-time foul detection through multimodal data fusion, temporal modeling, and improved domain adaptation techniques.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFootballSoccerHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedROC CurveDeep learning evaluationFoul detectionImage recognitionSports analytics

Identifiers

PMID40274843
PMCPMC12022285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.