ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Decoding vital variables in predicting different phases of suicide among young adults with childhood sexual abuse: a machine learning approach.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Young adults with childhood sexual abuse (CSA) are an especially vulnerable group to suicide. Suicide encompasses different phases, but for CSA survivors the salient factors precipitating suicide are rarely studied. In this study, from a progressive perspective of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB), we aim to identify distinct risk factors for predicting different stages of STB, i.e., suicidal ideation (SI), suicide plan (SP), and suicide attempt (SA), among young adults with CSA experience. Based on mental health profiles of 4,070 young adult CSA survivors from a cross-sectional survey, we constructed five random forest classification models to respectively classify high suicidality, SI, SP, and SA. The common crucial factors for predicting SI, SP, and SA included NSSI and depression. The special important predictors for SI included OCD, anxiety, PTSD, and social rhythm. Co-occurrence of other types of childhood abuse and traumatic events was a special important predictor for SP among participants with SI. Self-compassion was the most crucial factor in classifying SA from those with SI. Social rhythm, co-occurrence of other types of childhood abuse, domestic violence, fear of happiness, and self-compassion made specific contribution to the prediction of SI, SP, and SA. However, the random forest model failed to accurately classify SA from those with SP, which was consistent with existing research. Our findings highlighted the importance of identifying suicidal characteristics for specified interventions at different stages of suicide for young people with CSA experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.