ArticleNature communications2025
Functional impact of splicing variants in the elaboration of complex traits in cattle.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging precision agriculture and human medicine through comparative genetics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Resolving Cattle GWAS Loci: Current Progress, Persistent Challenges and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Causal variants in animal genomes: approaches to identification, phenotypic impact, and implications for selective breeding.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Assessing the effect of bovine MSTN variants on pre-mRNA splicing.Animal genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GWAS conducted directly on imputed whole genome sequence have led to the identification of numerous genetic variants associated with agronomic traits in cattle. However, such variants are often simply markers in linkage disequilibrium with the actual causal variants, which is a limiting factor for the development of accurate genomic predictions. It is possible to identify causal variants by integrating information on how variants impact gene expression into GWAS output. RNA splicing plays a major role in regulating gene expression. Thus, assessing the effect of variants on RNA splicing may explain their function. Here, we use a high-throughput strategy to functionally analyse putative splice-disrupting variants in the bovine genome. Using GWAS, massively parallel reporter assay and deep learning algorithms designed to predict splice-disrupting variants, we identify 38 splice-disrupting variants associated with complex traits in cattle, three of which could be classified as causal. Our results indicate that splice-disrupting variants are widely found in the quantitative trait loci related to these phenotypes. Using our combined approach, we also assess the validity of splicing predictors originally developed to analyse human variants in the context of the bovine genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.