ArticleNature communications2025
Hierarchical motion perception as causal inference.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Flexible computation of object motion and depth based on viewing geometry inferred from optic flow.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Environmental motion presented ahead of self-motion modulates heading direction estimation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Perceptual clustering in auditory streaming.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Causal inference predicts the transition from integration to segmentation in motion perception.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A neural mechanism for optic flow parsing in macaque visual cortex.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motion can only be defined relative to a reference frame; yet it remains unclear which reference frame guides perception. A century of psychophysical studies has produced conflicting evidence: retinotopic, egocentric, world-centric, or even object-centric. We introduce a hierarchical Bayesian model mapping retinal velocities to perceived velocities. Our model mirrors the structure in the world, in which visual elements move within causally connected reference frames. Friction renders velocities in these reference frames mostly stationary, formalized by an additional delta component (at zero) in the prior. Inverting this model automatically segments visual inputs into groups, groups into supergroups, progressively inferring structured reference frames and "perceives" motion in the appropriate reference frame. Critical model predictions are supported by two experiments, and fitting our model to the data allows us to infer the subjective set of reference frames used by individual observers. Our model provides a quantitative normative justification for key Gestalt principles providing inspiration for building better models of visual processing in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.