ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Growth of nematophagous fungi in the presence of anthelmintics drugs.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the activity of commercial anthelmintics for ruminants based on levamisole hydrochloride 7.5% (Ripercol®), abamectin solution 1% (Calbos®) and albendazole sulphoxide solution 15% (Agebendazole®) on the growth of the nematophagous fungi: Arthrobotrys musiformis, Duddingtonia flagrans and Pochonia chlamydosporia. The formulations were diluted in proportional parts, creating four levels of dilution (DL1, DL2, DL3 and DL4). For albendazole and abamectin the concentrations for each diluted solution were 1, 10, 100, 1000 ppm and for levamisole the concentrations were 2.23, 22.3, 223 and 2230 ppm. The treatments were accompanied by: negative control (NC)- culture medium only (PDA 2%); positive control (PC)- culture medium with fungal strain; and water control (WC). The response for each species of fungus was carried out using a factorial scheme, with three drugs and four dilutions, tested with three repetitions. The results showed that the fungi A. musiformis and P. chlamydosporia suffered less influence on their growth under the action of the anthelmintics, unlike D. flagrans which suffered greater inhibition of its growth. The anthelmintic albendazole at concentrations of 1 and 10 ppm had a greater influence on fungal growth. Understanding the viability of these associations is fundamental to establishing protocols aimed at reducing the incidence of worms in cattle farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.