ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Leveraging Self-regulated Learning in a Focused Direct-Observation and Feedback Model in the Ambulatory Setting for Improved Self-efficacy.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbulatory learning is time-limited, especially with regard to observation and feedback. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (CEX) can improve feedback and learner confidence but may overlook self-regulated learning (SRL), limiting the learner's role in the feedback continuum.
objectiveImplement a direct observation and feedback model within a fast-paced clinic setting based on mini-CEX combined with facilitative coaching with the goal of improving self-efficacy.
designMixed-methods post-implementation program evaluation.
participantsPrimary Care Track residents in an urban clinic serving an underserved population with complex needs. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed the model for participant experience through survey data and for resident perceived self-efficacy during the encounter through qualitative thematic analysis of narrative evaluations. KEY
resultsThis model was reported to be valuable by both faculty and resident respondents, but only half of direct observations were completed. A qualitative analysis of narrative assessments showed that incorporation of a pre-encounter discussion in the context of SRL leads to self-identified efficacy during the encounter, with emergence of five core themes: learner initiative drives encounters; failures are attributed to external locus of control; successes are perceived as growing internal outcomes; anticipatory framework encourages learner proactivity; and unique patient challenges demand learner reactivity.
conclusionThe pre-encounter priming of a direct observation improves the learner's ability to navigate external and internal factors of self-regulated learning and thereby improve self-efficacy. However, despite the design of this direct observation and feedback model to fit within known challenges of the ambulatory setting, there were still challenges to completion, often due to the resident's ability to navigate external factors. Ongoing iterations of direct observation and feedback models should be attentive to assisting learners in navigating external barriers, thereby building proactivity and reactivity in response to unexpected challenges in the encounter itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.