ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Objective skill assessment for cataract surgery from surgical microscope video.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVideo offers an accessible method for automated surgical skill evaluation; however, many platforms still rely on traditional six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) tracking systems, which can be costly, cumbersome, and challenging to apply clinically. This study aims to demonstrate that trainee skill in cataract surgery can be assessed effectively using only object detection from monocular surgical microscope video.
methodsOne ophthalmologist and four residents performed cataract surgery on a simulated eye five times each, generating 25 recordings. Recordings included both the surgical microscope video and 6-DOF instrument tracking data. Videos were graded by two expert ophthalmologists using the ICO-OSCAR:SICS rubric. We computed motion-based metrics using both object detection from video and 6-DOF tracking. We first examined correlations between each metric and expert scores for each rubric criteria. Then, using these findings, we trained an ordinal regression model to predict scores from each tracking modality and compared correlation strengths with expert scores.
resultsMetrics from object detection generally showed stronger correlations with expert scores than 6-DOF tracking. For score prediction, 6-DOF tracking showed no significant advantage, while scores predicted from object detection achieved significantly stronger correlations with expert scores for four scoring criteria.
conclusionOur results indicate that skill assessment from monocular surgical microscope video can match, and in some cases exceed, the correlation strengths of 6-DOF tracking assessments. This finding supports the feasibility of using object detection for skill assessment without additional hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40274719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.