ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Can 3-month models or observed 3- or 6-month patient-reported outcome measures accurately predict 12-month disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the impact of body-mass index on short- and medium-term outcomes after lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery: a single‑surgeon, multi‑hospital cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Preoperative multifidus activation during movement and low back pain worsening after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a prospective observational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMost lumbar decompressive surgery patients experience symptom improvement to 3 months, after which about 13% experience a clinically relevant deterioration. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are accepted as indicators of clinical outcome, but the earliest timepoint when PROMs stabilise is unknown and few studies have assessed risk factors for symptom deterioration. This study aimed to identify risk factors for symptom deterioration and identify whether 3-month models or observed 3- or 6-month outcomes accurately predict 12-month disability and pain.
methodsThe development cohort included 1096 prospectively collected discectomy or laminectomy cases with or without single-level fusion from 01/01/2008-31/12/2020 at a single centre. Three-month models were developed using baseline clinical variables and 3-month PROM. The primary 12-month outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary outcomes were back and leg pain. Validation was on 364 cases from 01/01/2021-31/12/2022. Predictive accuracy was evaluated by interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by area-under-the-curve (AUC) to classify to a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). MCID concordance rates for observed 3-month and 6-month with 12-month PROM were calculated.
resultsThree-month predictors of 12-month disability and pain were condition duration, smoking, diabetes, rheumatic disorder, lower limb arthroplasty, mobility aided, underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m
conclusionSymptom deterioration after 3 months is linked to baseline factors. This study demonstrates that 6-month PROM accurately predict individual patient 12-month disability and pain after 1-2 level discectomy or laminectomy. Fusion surgery requires a minimum 12-month PROM follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40274675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.