ArticlePlanta2025
Aspartic proteases from Silybum marianum: different plant-specific inserts, different destinations.
Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterologous Production of Cyprosin B in Nicotiana benthamiana: Unveiling the Role of the Plant-Specific Insert Domain in Protein Function and Subcellular Localisation.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Analysis of the aspartic protease gene family inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionPlant-specific inserts (PSIs) are supposed to direct typical aspartic peptidase (AP) to the vacuole. Two typical AP precursors possess distinct PSIs. One PSI directs the peptidase to the vacuole, while the other cannot. Typical plant aspartic peptidases (APs) are proteolytic enzymes unique to plants. What distinguishes this group of peptidases is the saposin-like domain known as the plant-specific insert (PSI), which is present in all typical AP zymogens. In this study, we cloned and characterized two novel typical APs from Silybum marianum flowers, designated AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2. Using in silico analysis and phylogenetic comparisons, we elucidated the structural features of their zymogens, including conserved motifs and catalytic subsites. Our findings suggest that these enzymes originated from the duplication of an ancestral AP gene. Although AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2 share sequence and structural similarities with other plant APs, they have potential differences in substrate specificity, which may be attributed to variations in the S3, S1', and S3' catalytic subsites. We also identified distinct putative N-glycosylation patterns between the two enzymes, with AP-Sm1 being glycosylated within its PSI domain. This domain has been suggested as a player in environmental adaptation and may influence the trafficking of typical AP zymogens through the secretory pathway. We observed differences in the subcellular localization of mRFP-fused AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2 when the C-terminal vacuolar sorting determinant (ctVSD) was non-functional. While AP-Sm2 localized to the vacuole, AP-Sm1 was detected in the apoplast. As suggested by other authors, the differential glycosylation profile within PSI domains might modulate intracellular trafficking, potentially contributing to its distinct localization pattern. These findings highlight the potential of AP PSIs as valuable models for further studies on protein trafficking mechanisms in plant cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40274662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.