Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274662›Full record

ArticlePlanta2025

Aspartic proteases from Silybum marianum: different plant-specific inserts, different destinations.

M Laura Colombo, Agustina Fernández, Constanza S Liggieri, Pablo Tornero, Laura S Bakás, Sandra E Vairo-Cavalli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of the aspartic protease gene family inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Laura ColomboDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Centro de Investigación de Proteínas Vegetales (CIProVe)-Centro Asociado CICPBA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Agustina FernándezDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Centro de Investigación de Proteínas Vegetales (CIProVe)-Centro Asociado CICPBA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Constanza S LiggieriDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Centro de Investigación de Proteínas Vegetales (CIProVe)-Centro Asociado CICPBA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Pablo TorneroInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Laura S BakásDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Centro de Investigación de Proteínas Vegetales (CIProVe)-Centro Asociado CICPBA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Sandra E Vairo-CavalliDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Centro de Investigación de Proteínas Vegetales (CIProVe)-Centro Asociado CICPBA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. svairo@biol.unlp.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-5391

Funding

Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata Project X-914Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata Project X-965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionPlant-specific inserts (PSIs) are supposed to direct typical aspartic peptidase (AP) to the vacuole. Two typical AP precursors possess distinct PSIs. One PSI directs the peptidase to the vacuole, while the other cannot. Typical plant aspartic peptidases (APs) are proteolytic enzymes unique to plants. What distinguishes this group of peptidases is the saposin-like domain known as the plant-specific insert (PSI), which is present in all typical AP zymogens. In this study, we cloned and characterized two novel typical APs from Silybum marianum flowers, designated AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2. Using in silico analysis and phylogenetic comparisons, we elucidated the structural features of their zymogens, including conserved motifs and catalytic subsites. Our findings suggest that these enzymes originated from the duplication of an ancestral AP gene. Although AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2 share sequence and structural similarities with other plant APs, they have potential differences in substrate specificity, which may be attributed to variations in the S3, S1', and S3' catalytic subsites. We also identified distinct putative N-glycosylation patterns between the two enzymes, with AP-Sm1 being glycosylated within its PSI domain. This domain has been suggested as a player in environmental adaptation and may influence the trafficking of typical AP zymogens through the secretory pathway. We observed differences in the subcellular localization of mRFP-fused AP-Sm1 and AP-Sm2 when the C-terminal vacuolar sorting determinant (ctVSD) was non-functional. While AP-Sm2 localized to the vacuole, AP-Sm1 was detected in the apoplast. As suggested by other authors, the differential glycosylation profile within PSI domains might modulate intracellular trafficking, potentially contributing to its distinct localization pattern. These findings highlight the potential of AP PSIs as valuable models for further studies on protein trafficking mechanisms in plant cells.

Indexed as

Aspartic Acid ProteasesPlant ProteinsSilybum marianumAmino Acid SequenceCloning, MolecularFlowersGlycosylationPhylogenySubstrate SpecificityVacuolesAspartic Acid ProteasesPlant ProteinsApoplast sortingSilpepsinTypical aspartic peptidasesVacuolar sortingZymogens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.