Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40274544›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Coordinative Ring-Opening Polymerization of Limonene Carbamate Toward Phosgene- and Isocyanate-Free Polyurethane.

Jonas Futter, Leon F Richter, Stefanie Hörl, Moritz Kränzlein, Bernhard Rieger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas FutterWacker-Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Chemie, Catalysis Research Center, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748, Garching, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-3952
Leon F RichterMolecular Catalysis, Catalysis Research Center, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748, Garching, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-9156
Stefanie HörlWacker-Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Chemie, Catalysis Research Center, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748, Garching, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-0129
Moritz KränzleinWacker-Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Chemie, Catalysis Research Center, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748, Garching, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-0735
Bernhard RiegerWacker-Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Chemie, Catalysis Research Center, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748, Garching, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-884X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a phosgene- and isocyanate-free route for the synthesis of polyurethanes using (R)-limonene as a bio-based starting material. The synthesis of the cyclic limonene-based carbamate monomer LU is achieved in high yields using dimethyl carbonate as a sustainable, less hazardous phosgene surrogate and is verified by NMR, SC-XRD, ESI-MS, GC-MS, and elemental analysis. Polymerizations were carried out by coordinative ring-opening polymerization. Sn(Oct)

Indexed as

Isocyanate‐free synthesisLimonene‐based polymersPhosgene‐free synthesisPolyurethaneRing‐opening polymerization

Identifiers

PMID40274544
PMCPMC12338414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.