ArticleNursing open2025
Exploring Registered Nurses' Experiences of Workplace Adversity: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of received support on distressing experiences among nurses as second victims: the mediating role of psychological capital.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Workplace Adversity Among Critical Care Nurses: Associations With Key Organisational Factors.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore registered nurses' firsthand experiences of workplace adversity.
designA qualitative exploratory, descriptive study.
methodsData were collected from July to September 2022 using semi-structured interviews. A purposive sample of seven registered nurses from New Zealand was used. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes emerged: (1) manifestations of workplace adversity, (2) professional identity and resilience, (3) coping and resilience in workplace adversity and (4) nature and characteristics of support. This study highlights the multifaceted nature of workplace adversity for nurses, impacting their physical, psychological and emotional well-being and performance, and beyond the workplace, spilling over to their personal lives. However, nurses demonstrated resilience, drawing on past experiences and professional identity to cope. While professional development opportunities fostered growth, a supportive work environment emerged as crucial. This work environment should value diverse experiences, promote positive role models and prioritise ethical practices alongside career advancement.
conclusionNurses are greatly affected by various aspects of workplace adversity. Cultivating professional identity and resilience may help counter the negative effects of workplace adversity. Further research is necessary to identify organisational-level strategies to decrease workplace adversity. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Healthcare organisations must prioritise safe and supportive work environments for nurses. IMPACT: The purpose of this research was to explore the problem of workplace adversity nurses face. Despite valuing professional identity, psychological resilience and coping mechanisms, participating registered nurses find it difficult to overcome the adverse effects of workplace adversity due to mounting demands. The results of this study are relevant when formulating policies, strategies, and programmes that can benefit nurses, healthcare institutions and patients globally. REPORTING
methodThe Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. Participants were not involved in the design or conduct of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.