ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
Contraception Coverage Policy in the United States: History and Current Challenges.
Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundState and federal policies have aimed to expand access to contraception by providing coverage of its costs in both public and private health insurance. Yet barriers to contraception coverage remain and are expected to increase after the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. This paper describes the history of these policies and current challenges.
methodsWe constructed a chronology of federal and state policies providing coverage of the cost of contraception in both public and private health insurance, from establishment of the federal right to contraception through 2024, using published sources and public datasets. We aligned the chronology with the history of the development of contraception technology and practices, as described by historians and social scientists, and with political and legal challenges.
resultsFollowing establishment of a federal right to contraception after nearly a century of restrictions under the 1873 Comstock Act, three waves of contraception coverage policymaking sought to increase access to contraception by making it more affordable to consumers. These waves included options for states to expand coverage for contraception within the Medicaid program; passage of state contraception coverage equity laws to ensure parity for contraceptive coverage in private health plans; and the Affordable Care Act's national contraceptive coverage requirement and its subsequent modifications, clarifications, and codifications. Post-Dobbs, challenges to contraception coverage include efforts to redefine certain contraceptives as abortifacients and to resurrect some of the restrictions of the Comstock Act. The requirement of no-cost coverage of preventive services is also threatened.
conclusionContraception coverage policy will be impacted by ongoing challenges to contraception and abortion access, as well as changing contraceptive technology and modes of delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.