ArticleEuropean urology2025
Longitudinal Evaluation of Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease.
Article in European urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07554508 (A Prospective Registry for Belzutifan in the Treatment of Von Hippel-Lindau), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Registry for Belzutifan in the Treatment of Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Belzutifan efficacy in von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated renal cell carcinoma versus natural history control arm.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome presenting as a lateral ventricular space-occupying lesion: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- From surgery to systemic therapy in von Hippel-Lindau disease: insights from extended follow-up of LITESPARK-004.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Synchronous giant bilateral renal tumors as initial presentation of Von Hippel-Lindau disease: Sequential surgical management and transition to renal replacement therapy.Urology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAn understanding the natural history of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is critical to the development of optimal clinical management approaches and interpretation of trial results for comparable populations and endpoints. Our aim was to describe the natural progression of disease in patients with VHL RCC.
methodsThis was a natural history study involving 244 patients with VHL with ≥10-mm renal tumor(s) who were evaluated and managed at the US National Cancer Institute between 2004 and 2020. We analyzed radiographic outcomes, renal surgeries, metastasis, sequalae of surgery, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), and mortality. Radiographic outcomes were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. The primary analyses were descriptive in nature. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 178 patients with at least three serial tumor assessments and up to 5 yr of follow-up, the rate of spontaneous tumor regression (≥30% decrease) was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-5.2%). The probability of not having disease progression in the presence of competing risks at 5 yr was 37% (95% CI 30-44%). During follow-up, 186/244 patients had one or more renal surgeries, and 108/244 had two or more. RCC metastasis was reported for 12 patients. Among patients who underwent surgery, 41% developed postprocedure CKD. Potential limitations include selection bias and misclassification of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study demonstrates that RCC is a significant burden for VHL patients, with high rates of disease progression, surgery, and metastasis development, even in a closely monitored, multidisciplinary clinical environment, and identifies CKD as an underappreciated aspect of VHL. These findings can provide a context for the antitumor activity of new treatments for RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.